Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Susan's avatar

As you’ve completed all nine parts now and presumably don’t need to avoid spoilers, it may be worth re-examining the pairing of chapters 52 and 64 with the benefit of hindsight.

Chapters 52 and 64 do echo each other more than it first appears. They each feature opposing responses to the sudden and unnatural death of an estranged loved one.

Strike wakes to discover Charlotte’s suicide, but even before he receives the news he is surrounded by supportive messages from friends and family. Emily believes herself to be partly responsible for the death of her brother, having falsely accused him of sexual abuse before his (as she believes) suicide. She refuses to enter his burial site or desecrate it as her church demands. A church principle threatens violence.

There’s also Robin’s discussion with Shawna about Jacob’s soul and what he can expect after death. There’s another contrast here, I think. Jacob can’t call anyone for help on his own, but these small mentions of him are the echoes of his obvious need and the ways cult members are choosing not to hear it. Charlotte had many options when it came to seeking help for herself, but the only requests we know of were also deliberately ignored. In both cases the choice to withhold succor was a response to a longer history of coercive abuse, albeit in different ways.

The children of the UHC are obediently coloring in pictures of a man who died by suicide (after his family mishandled an attempt at rescuing him) complete with noose. Robin is alarmed by the evidence of their emotional neglect. Strike reflects on his childhood experiences with religion and the comfort of order, boredom and structure. A rector offers sincere condolences but gives him room to grieve as he chooses.

If we group chapters 53-54, we also have Robin forcibly, horribly confronted with her hurt and shame from a past relationship—not just her role as a victim but the way she failed Matthew in his time of need. Strike talks to his mental image of Charlotte, facing his own failures and motivations.

As a side note, while I understand why you describe Strike’s deleting Charlotte’s messages as “just shy of murder,” coercive threats like that are common in abusive relationships. The relationship was over. Charlotte was suffering, I’m sure, but she wasn’t tied to the train tracks as Strike walked away. She was holding herself hostage in an attempt to force him to re-engage with her, a tactic she’d used before and which she’d likely repeat as long as he responded. He could have called her sister or a suicide hotline, but presumably others could have done the same. Her family and friends surely knew she wasn’t doing well, given the assault charge. And she did have family and friends, as well as money, intelligence, therapists and doctors.

Expand full comment
Kathleen OConnor's avatar

Wow! As is often the case, this post has my mind churning in different directions. Thank you! My comment for the moment will be that I hadn’t before encountered the part one- part two demarcation in GoF tidbit. Picture a mushroom cloud exploding through the top of my hair.

Expand full comment
10 more comments...

No posts